Appellate Jurisdiction

This time, we’re reviewing the share of appeals accounted for by final judgments in the 1990s.  As a reminder, we’re defining “criminal” broadly to include quasi-criminal cases such as habeas corpus, as well as juvenile justice cases.  Until 2011 when Illinois abolished the death penalty, we also include direct appeals to the Supreme Court from

4413403132_725cb1fd39_zToday we conclude our review of the data on the sources of appellate jurisdiction on the civil and criminal dockets of the Illinois Supreme Court between 2000 and 2015. We’ve shown that in a typical year, final judgments comprise between fifty-five and seventy percent of the Court’s civil docket, although that figure has at times

10177336773_e542612caa_zFor the past two weeks, we’ve been looking at the sources of appellate jurisdiction on the civil and criminal dockets of the Illinois Supreme Court, analyzing how heavily the Court inclines to reviewing final over interlocutory decisions. We’ve shown that throughout its recent history, although appeals from final judgments under Supreme Court Rule 301 form

497353227_ce4938472d_zLast week, we showed that during the first five years of our study period, review of final decisions was not the dominant feature of the Illinois Supreme Court’s criminal docket (at least to the degree it dominated the civil docket). Yesterday, we discussed the data from the civil docket between 2005 and 2009. Now, we

2331754875_e6a2a81429_b

Last week, we began the latest phase of our analysis of the decision making of the Illinois Supreme Court by looking at the question of whether the Court prefers to review final decisions from the trial courts rather than interlocutory orders.  [1] We found that during the years 2000-2004, appeals brought under Supreme Court Rule

21930415010_fec084fcb6_z

Yesterday, we announced the expansion of our data library on the work of the Illinois Supreme Court to encompass all of the Court’s decisions since January 1, 2000 – civil, criminal, quasi-criminal and disciplinary.  Today, we begin the next phase of our analysis of the Court’s work.

We begin by revisiting one of the first

2949389569_1b6da5fcf8_zWe’ve been looking at the sources of appellate jurisdiction for the Illinois Supreme Court’s civil docket.  Does the Court prefer to review final decisions with fully formed records?  How often does the Court review interlocutory decisions?

Between 2000 and 2004, Rule 301 appeals comprised between sixty and seventy percent of the Court’s civil docket.

Between

9684676149_d95f65161a_zIn our last post, we began looking at the sources of appellate jurisdiction on the Illinois Supreme Court’s civil docket.  Does the Court mostly review final decisions?  If the Court frequently hears interlocutory appeals on its civil docket, does it show a preference for any particular kind of interlocutory appeal – constitutional cases or appeals