9497252703_7c15a1c787_zYesterday, we addressed the reversal rates of the districts and divisions of the Appellate Court. Now we turn to a related issue.

Reversal rates may conceal the true degree of disagreement on the Court with the decisions coming out of any particular District and division. Reversal is a binary variable: a 4-3 reversal affects a

1388658196_42cbd8134e_zLast week, we addressed the dissent rate in civil cases at the Illinois Supreme Court. This week, we turn to a new aspect of the Court’s decision making.

During the past twenty years, the most frequently cited statistic among observers of the United States Supreme Court has been the “reversal rate” of each federal Circuit.

13334080323_641e55ab35_zLast week, we looked at the question of how often the Illinois Supreme Court considers unanimous civil decisions from the Appellate Court. Now we turn to a related question: how often does the Court review unpublished decisions?According to Illinois Supreme Court Rule 23, the Appellate Courts are to issue formal opinions under only two circumstances:

11585837205_87d514e4b7_zIn the last two posts, we’ve been investigating where in the state the Illinois Supreme Court tends to draw its civil docket from. Now, we turn to the last five years of our study period.

Table_6_C_Part_1Table_6_C_Part_2

During the most recent years – comprising the entirety of the Kilbride Court and the beginning of the Garman Court

13633022513_eb04353de8_zIn our last post, we began our discussion of where in the state the Illinois Supreme Court’s civil docket has come from over the past fifteen years, beginning with population figures for 2000 and 2010, and including also the data from 2000-2004.

For the second five years of the study period, the Court’s civil caseload

4854192144_f659b8eb9a_zIn our last several posts, we considered how frequently the Illinois Supreme Court agrees to review summary judgments.

Next we consider the geographical sources of the Court’s civil docket.  The most obvious driver of caseload should be population – more residents equals more litigation, and therefore more candidates for possible Supreme Court review.  Therefore, as

2949389569_1b6da5fcf8_zWe’ve been looking at the sources of appellate jurisdiction for the Illinois Supreme Court’s civil docket.  Does the Court prefer to review final decisions with fully formed records?  How often does the Court review interlocutory decisions?

Between 2000 and 2004, Rule 301 appeals comprised between sixty and seventy percent of the Court’s civil docket.

Between

9684676149_d95f65161a_zIn our last post, we began looking at the sources of appellate jurisdiction on the Illinois Supreme Court’s civil docket.  Does the Court mostly review final decisions?  If the Court frequently hears interlocutory appeals on its civil docket, does it show a preference for any particular kind of interlocutory appeal – constitutional cases or appeals