5989414114_995a0a4dc6

Originally published on Law360, Feb. 3, 2016. Posted with permission.

For the past three years, we’ve taken a close statistical look at the previous year’s decisions from the Illinois Supreme Court to see what insights could be gained about the justices’ voting patterns and decision making dynamics. (View the 2012 analysis here, 2013

5275403364_6396c50053_zLast week, we continued our look at the question patterns in civil cases at the Illinois Supreme Court by analyzing whether there’s a higher-than-random likelihood that the Justice asking the first question to either side is writing the majority opinion.

Today, we continue our analysis with a somewhat different issue: do the Justices tend to

3236052269_58328bc076_zLast week, we addressed the reversal rate of the Appellate Court districts in civil cases at the Illinois Supreme Court.

Today, we begin taking a closer look at the data.  Even viewed from the District-by-District level, Appellate Court reversal rates are a composite statistic, and therefore may be hiding important insights. Suppose, for example, that

225249268_a1bfcd0d68_zIn our last post, we continued our examination of the legal issues appearing on the Illinois Supreme Court’s civil docket, examining the period 2005-2009.

Turning to the final five years of our study period, we see tort cases slightly down in absolute terms. Government/administrative and constitutional law cases are down on the Court’s civil docket,

756386726_e8627c028a_zIn our last post, we began our consideration of the areas of law covered by the Illinois Supreme Court’s civil docket between 2000 and 2004. We found that torts, civil procedure and government/administrative cases led the Court’s docket, although the Court also showed a significant interest in constitutional and workers’ compensation law. We now turn