Photo of Kirk Jenkins

Kirk Jenkins brings a wealth of experience to his appellate practice, which focuses on antitrust and constitutional law, as well as products liability, RICO, price fixing, information sharing among competitors and class certification. In addition to handling appeals, he also regularly works with trial teams to ensure that important issues are properly presented and preserved for appellate review.  Mr. Jenkins is a pioneer in the application of data analytics to appellate decision-making and writes two analytics blogs, the California Supreme Court Review and the Illinois Supreme Court Review, as well as regularly writing for various legal publications.

13334080323_641e55ab35_zLast week, we looked at the question of how often the Illinois Supreme Court considers unanimous civil decisions from the Appellate Court. Now we turn to a related question: how often does the Court review unpublished decisions?According to Illinois Supreme Court Rule 23, the Appellate Courts are to issue formal opinions under only two circumstances:

5989414114_995a0a4dc6_zI thought we’d interrupt our ongoing discussion of the Illinois Supreme Court’s modern history across the whole of its docket to focus on a major event at the Court coming up this week: Wednesday afternoon’s oral argument in In re Pension Reform Litigation.

First, a bit of background for anyone who hasn’t been following

225249268_a1bfcd0d68_zIn our last post, we continued our examination of the legal issues appearing on the Illinois Supreme Court’s civil docket, examining the period 2005-2009.

Turning to the final five years of our study period, we see tort cases slightly down in absolute terms. Government/administrative and constitutional law cases are down on the Court’s civil docket,

756386726_e8627c028a_zIn our last post, we began our consideration of the areas of law covered by the Illinois Supreme Court’s civil docket between 2000 and 2004. We found that torts, civil procedure and government/administrative cases led the Court’s docket, although the Court also showed a significant interest in constitutional and workers’ compensation law. We now turn

754400691_45a3b203ed_z

In our last three posts, we’ve been addressing where in the state the Illinois Supreme Court’s civil docket comes from. Now, we turn to another issue we addressed briefly several posts earlier – what areas of the law does the Court’s case load come from.

One of the advantages of studying so extensive a period

11585837205_87d514e4b7_zIn the last two posts, we’ve been investigating where in the state the Illinois Supreme Court tends to draw its civil docket from. Now, we turn to the last five years of our study period.

Table_6_C_Part_1Table_6_C_Part_2

During the most recent years – comprising the entirety of the Kilbride Court and the beginning of the Garman Court

13633022513_eb04353de8_zIn our last post, we began our discussion of where in the state the Illinois Supreme Court’s civil docket has come from over the past fifteen years, beginning with population figures for 2000 and 2010, and including also the data from 2000-2004.

For the second five years of the study period, the Court’s civil caseload

4854192144_f659b8eb9a_zIn our last several posts, we considered how frequently the Illinois Supreme Court agrees to review summary judgments.

Next we consider the geographical sources of the Court’s civil docket.  The most obvious driver of caseload should be population – more residents equals more litigation, and therefore more candidates for possible Supreme Court review.  Therefore, as